Cross-State Validation of a Tool Supporting Implementation of Rural Kinship Navigator Programs

dc.contributor.authorRouth, Brianna
dc.contributor.authorMcKibbin, Christine L.
dc.contributor.authorWihry, David
dc.contributor.authorCrittenden, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorFoluso, Ayomide A.
dc.contributor.authorJain, Jennifer
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-03T19:47:12Z
dc.date.issued2024-09
dc.description.abstractWhile kinship care is prevalent and preferred over out-of-family care, there are relatively few measurement tools validated for use with this audience. The Title IV-E Clearinghouse, used to rate Families First Prevention Services such as Kinship Navigator Programs, requires valid tools. Such families face a myriad of needs in supporting children in their care. Previous research has established the significant challenges faced by rural families. Accurate assessment of these needs, particularly for rural families, is an essential component of kinship navigation services. In this study, we examined the face validity of the Family Needs Scale for use with kinship caregivers in rural programs. Methods: The evaluation teams with each respective kinship program conducted four virtual focus groups comprising kinship caregivers (n = 18) in three rural states. Participants were recruited from outside an ongoing Kinship Navigator Program Evaluation sample but had previously received program support as kinship caregivers. All states received IRB approval from their respective universities. Verbal consent was obtained at the time of the focus group. Focus groups lasted approximately 60–90 min and participants received a gift card incentive. Data were transcribed and qualitatively coded by question set and individual questions to identify phenomenological trends. Findings: Across four focus groups, we found four themes: (1) Broad agreement regarding the face validity of most assessment items; (2) Lack of clarity and shared understanding of several terms used within the tool, (3) Responses change with Ages and Stages of kinship family, and (4) Perspective considerations varying when completing the assessment. Discussion: Findings indicate that most assessment items had strong face validity, where there are a few opportunities to clarify key concepts relevant to rural kinship families and assess additional needs to understand the situational scope of the kinship experience. Overall, the needs assessment tool appears to have validity in assessing current kinship needs and outcomes within Kinship Navigator program evaluation.
dc.identifier.citationRouth B, McKibbin C, Wihry D, Crittenden JA, Foluso A, Jain J. Cross-State Validation of a Tool Supporting Implementation of Rural Kinship Navigator Programs. Societies. 2024; 14(9):178. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14090178
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/soc14090178
dc.identifier.issn2075-4698
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/18988
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.rightscc-by
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectkinship
dc.subjectrural
dc.subjectresource
dc.titleCross-State Validation of a Tool Supporting Implementation of Rural Kinship Navigator Programs
dc.typeArticle
mus.citation.extentfirstpage1
mus.citation.extentlastpage14
mus.citation.issue9
mus.citation.journaltitleSocieties
mus.citation.volume14
mus.relation.collegeHealth & Human Development
mus.relation.departmentFood Systems, Nutrition & Kinesiology
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozeman

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
routh-rural-kinship-navigator-programs-2024.pdf
Size:
229.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
825 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.