Network of networks: Time series clustering of AmeriFlux sites

dc.contributor.authorReed, David E.
dc.contributor.authorChu, Housen
dc.contributor.authorPeter, B. G.
dc.contributor.authorChen, Jiquan
dc.contributor.authorAbraha, Michael
dc.contributor.authorAmiro, B. D.
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Ray G. et al.
dc.contributor.authorKnowles, John F.
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-04T21:55:28Z
dc.date.issued2025-06
dc.description.abstractEnvironmental observation networks, such as AmeriFlux, are foundational for monitoring ecosystem response to climate change, management practices, and natural disturbances; however, their effectiveness depends on their representativeness for the regions or continents. We proposed an empirical, time series approach to quantify the similarity of ecosystem fluxes across AmeriFlux sites. We extracted the diel and seasonal characteristics (i.e., amplitudes, phases) from carbon dioxide, water vapor, energy, and momentum fluxes, which reflect the effects of climate, plant phenology, and ecophysiology on the observations, and explored the potential aggregations of AmeriFlux sites through hierarchical clustering. While net radiation and temperature showed latitudinal clustering as expected, flux variables revealed a more uneven clustering with many small (number of sites < 5), unique groups and a few large (> 100) to intermediate (15–70) groups, highlighting the significant ecological regulations of ecosystem fluxes. Many identified unique groups were from under-sampled ecoregions and biome types of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP), with distinct flux dynamics compared to the rest of the network. At the finer spatial scale, local topography, disturbance, management, edaphic, and hydrological regimes further enlarge the difference in flux dynamics within the groups. Nonetheless, our clustering approach is a data-driven method to interpret the AmeriFlux network, informing future cross-site syntheses, upscaling, and model-data benchmarking research. Finally, we highlighted the unique and underrepresented sites in the AmeriFlux network, which were found mainly in Hawaii and Latin America, mountains, and at under-sampled IGBP types (e.g., urban, open water), motivating the incorporation of new/unregistered sites from these groups.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110686
dc.identifier.issn0168-1923
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/19628
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.rights© This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectAmeriFlux network
dc.subjectEddy covariance
dc.subjectSite uniqueness
dc.subjectSite clustering
dc.titleNetwork of networks: Time series clustering of AmeriFlux sites
dc.typeArticle
mus.citation.extentfirstpage1
mus.citation.extentlastpage35
mus.citation.journaltitleAgricultural and Forest Meteorology
mus.citation.volume372
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Agriculture
mus.relation.departmentLand Resources & Environmental Sciences
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozeman

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
reed-clustering-ameriflux-sites-2025.pdf
Size:
3.59 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
825 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: