Separation of Net Ecosystem Exchange into Assimilation and Respiration Using a Light Response Curve Approach: Critical Issues and Global Evaluation

dc.contributor.authorLasslop, Gitta
dc.contributor.authorReichstein, Markus
dc.contributor.authorPapale, Dario
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Andrew D.
dc.contributor.authorArneth, Almut
dc.contributor.authorBarr, Alan G.
dc.contributor.authorStoy, Paul C.
dc.contributor.authorWohlfahrt, Georg
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-25T16:08:36Z
dc.date.available2019-02-25T16:08:36Z
dc.date.issued2010-01
dc.description.abstractThe measured net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO2 between the ecosystem and the atmosphere reflects the balance between gross CO2 assimilation [gross primary production (GPP)] and ecosystem respiration (Reco). For understanding the mechanistic responses of ecosystem processes to environmental change it is important to separate these two flux components. Two approaches are conventionally used: (1) respiration measurements made at night are extrapolated to the daytime or (2) light–response curves are fit to daytime NEE measurements and respiration is estimated from the intercept of the ordinate, which avoids the use of potentially problematic nighttime data. We demonstrate that this approach is subject to biases if the effect of vapor pressure deficit (VPD) modifying the light response is not included. We introduce an algorithm for NEE partitioning that uses a hyperbolic light response curve fit to daytime NEE, modified to account for the temperature sensitivity of respiration and the VPD limitation of photosynthesis. Including the VPD dependency strongly improved the model's ability to reproduce the asymmetric diurnal cycle during periods with high VPD, and enhances the reliability of Reco estimates given that the reduction of GPP by VPD may be otherwise incorrectly attributed to higher Reco. Results from this improved algorithm are compared against estimates based on the conventional nighttime approach. The comparison demonstrates that the uncertainty arising from systematic errors dominates the overall uncertainty of annual sums (median absolute deviation of GPP: 47 g C m−2 yr−1), while errors arising from the random error (median absolute deviation: ∼2 g C m−2 yr−1) are negligible. Despite site‐specific differences between the methods, overall patterns remain robust, adding confidence to statistical studies based on the FLUXNET database. In particular, we show that the strong correlation between GPP and Reco is not spurious but holds true when quasi‐independent, i.e. daytime and nighttime based estimates are compared.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipU.S. Department ofEnergy, Biological and Environmental Research, Terrestrial Car-bon Program (DE-FG02-04ER63917); AT-Neu site:EC FP 5 project CarboMont (EVK2-CT2001-00125)en_US
dc.identifier.citationLasslop, Gitta, Markus Reichstein, Dario Papale, Andrew D. Richardson, Almut Arneth, Alan Barr, Paul C. Stoy, Georg Wohlfahrt. “Separation of Net Ecosystem Exchange into Assimilation and Respiration Using a Light Response Curve Approach: Critical Issues and Global Evaluation.” Global Change Biology 16, no. 1 (January 2010): 187–208. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02041.x.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2486
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/15289
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.titleSeparation of Net Ecosystem Exchange into Assimilation and Respiration Using a Light Response Curve Approach: Critical Issues and Global Evaluationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage187en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage208en_US
mus.citation.issue1en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleGlobal Change Biologyen_US
mus.citation.volume16en_US
mus.data.thumbpage6en_US
mus.identifier.categoryLife Sciences & Earth Sciencesen_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02041.xen_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Agricultureen_US
mus.relation.departmentLand Resources & Environmental Sciences.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
StoyLab_GCB_2010A_FINAL.pdf
Size:
1004.11 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
826 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections

Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.