Built environment approaches: Extension personnel's preferences, barriers, and facilitators

dc.contributor.authorBalis, Laura E.
dc.contributor.authorGrocke-Dewey, Michelle
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-26T20:22:03Z
dc.date.available2023-01-26T20:22:03Z
dc.date.issued2022-10
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Interventions that modify the built environment can increase population physical activity levels and prevent chronic disease. The national Cooperative Extension System is poised to implement built environment approaches (i.e., pedestrian/bicycle infrastructure and enhanced access to physical activity spaces), but implementation strategies (i.e., methods or techniques to move research to practice) are needed to improve uptake. Effective implementation strategies address relevant barriers and capitalize on facilitators. The purpose of this study was to understand 1) barriers and facilitators to implementing built environment approaches in two state Extension systems, 2) preferences for built environment approaches, and 3) preferences for implementation strategies. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was used to understand Extension personnel's preferences for and barriers and facilitators to built environment approaches through a mixed-methods study design. This work was informed by anthropological inquiry as the overall research philosophy, and by the Health Impact Pyramid, Leeman et al.'s classification of implementation strategies, and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research as the theoretical frameworks. The survey was distributed to eligible Extension personnel (n = 42) in two states. Quantitative data analysis consisted of numbers/proportions and Friedman tests. Qualitative analysis was completed through a rapid deductive approach to quickly produce actionable results. Results: Fourteen respondents (33%) completed the survey. Most had not implemented physical activity interventions in their communities or had implemented only individual-level interventions, though were interested in implementing built environment approaches. Benches, playground improvements, and crosswalks were the most desired approaches, while facilitation, assessing community strengths and needs, and technical assistance were desired implementation strategies. The most common barriers were relative priority and available resources; facilitators were external policy and incentives and implementation climate. Discussion: Extension personnel are receptive to built environment approaches and engaged with community coalitions. Yet, invested parties prefer individual-level interventions, and agents perceive a lack of resources for implementation. Implementation strategies that build capacity in both the Extension system and community coalitions may address these barriers through increasing relative priority and sharing existing resources. This work is a first step toward compiling implementation strategies to address relevant barriers to built environment approaches in community settings.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBalis LE and Grocke-Dewey M (2022) Built environment approaches: Extension personnel’s preferences, barriers, and facilitators. Front. Public Health 10:960949. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.960949en_US
dc.identifier.issn2296-2565
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/17646
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SAen_US
dc.rightscc-byen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectimplementation strategiesen_US
dc.subjectcontextual inquiry methodsen_US
dc.subjectcooperative extension serviceen_US
dc.subjectphysical activityen_US
dc.subjectcommunity settingen_US
dc.titleBuilt environment approaches: Extension personnel's preferences, barriers, and facilitatorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage1en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage9en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleFrontiers in Public Healthen_US
mus.citation.volume10en_US
mus.identifier.doi10.3389/fpubh.2022.960949en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Education, Health & Human Developmenten_US
mus.relation.departmentHealth & Human Development.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
balis-extension-2022.pdf
Size:
224.02 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
preferences, barriers, and facilitators
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.