New snow metrics for a warming world

dc.contributor.authorNolin, Anne W.
dc.contributor.authorSproles, Eric A.
dc.contributor.authorRupp, David E.
dc.contributor.authorCrumley, Ryan L.
dc.contributor.authorWebb, Mariana J.
dc.contributor.authorPalomaki, Ross T.
dc.contributor.authorMar, Eugene
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-13T20:50:15Z
dc.date.available2022-09-13T20:50:15Z
dc.date.issued2021-06
dc.description.abstractSnow is Earth's most climatically sensitive land cover type. Traditional snow metrics may not be able to adequately capture the changing nature of snow cover. For example, April 1 snow water equivalent (SWE) has been an effective index for streamflow forecasting, but it cannot express the effects of midwinter melt events, now expected in warming snow climates, nor can we assume that station-based measurements will be representative of snow conditions in future decades. Remote sensing and climate model data provide capacity for a suite of multi-use snow metrics from local to global scales. Such indicators need to be simple enough to “tell the story” of snowpack changes over space and time, but not overly simplistic or overly complicated in their interpretation. We describe a suite of spatially explicit, multi-temporal snow metrics based on global satellite data from NASA's Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and downscaled climate model output for the U.S. We describe and provide examples for Snow Cover Frequency (SCF), Snow Disappearance Date (SDD), At-Risk Snow (ARS), and Frequency of a Warm Winter (FWW). Using these retrospective and prospective snow metrics, we assess the current and future snow-related conditions in three hydroclimatically different U.S. watersheds: the Truckee, Colorado Headwaters, and Upper Connecticut. In the two western U.S. watersheds, SCF and SDD show greater sensitivity to annual differences in snow cover compared with data from the ground-based Snow Telemetry (SNOTEL) network. The eastern U.S. watershed does not have a ground-based network of data, so these MODIS-derived metrics provide uniquely valuable snow information. The ARS and FWW metrics show that the Truckee Watershed is highly vulnerable to conversion from snowfall to rainfall (ARS) and midwinter melt events (FWW) throughout the seasonal snow zone. In comparison, the Colorado Headwaters and Upper Connecticut Watersheds are colder and much less vulnerable through mid- and late-century.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNolin, Anne W., Eric A. Sproles, David E. Rupp, Ryan L. Crumley, Mariana J. Webb, Ross T. Palomaki, and Eugene Mar. "New snow metrics for a warming world." Hydrological Processes 35, no. 6 (2021): e14262.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0885-6087
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/17143
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nden_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectsnow metricsen_US
dc.subjectwarming worlden_US
dc.titleNew snow metrics for a warming worlden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage1en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage13en_US
mus.citation.issue6en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleHydrological Processesen_US
mus.citation.volume35en_US
mus.data.thumbpage6en_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1002/hyp.14262en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Letters & Scienceen_US
mus.relation.departmentEarth Sciencesen_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nolin-snow-2021.pdf
Size:
4.24 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
snow metrics

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
826 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: