Phylogenomic analysis of novel Diaforarchaea is consistent with sulfite but not sulfate reduction in volcanic environments on early Earth

dc.contributor.authorColman, Daniel R.
dc.contributor.authorLindsay, Melody R.
dc.contributor.authorAmenabar, Maximiliano J.
dc.contributor.authorFernandes-Martins, Maria C.
dc.contributor.authorRoden, Eric R.
dc.contributor.authorBoyd, Eric S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-07T17:52:29Z
dc.date.available2021-01-07T17:52:29Z
dc.date.issued2020-02
dc.description.abstractThe origin(s) of dissimilatory sulfate and/or (bi)sulfite reducing organisms (SRO) remains enigmatic despite their importance in global carbon and sulfur cycling since at least 3.4 Ga. Here, we describe novel, deep-branching archaeal SRO populations distantly related to other Diaforarchaea from two moderately acidic thermal springs. Dissimilatory (bi)sulfite reductase homologs, DsrABC, encoded in metagenome assembled genomes (MAGs) from spring sediments comprise one of the earliest evolving Dsr lineages. DsrA homologs were expressed in situ under moderately acidic conditions. MAGs lacked genes encoding proteins that activate sulfate prior to (bi)sulfite reduction. This is consistent with sulfide production in enrichment cultures provided sulfite but not sulfate. We suggest input of volcanic sulfur dioxide to anoxic spring-water yields (bi)sulfite and moderately acidic conditions that favor its stability and bioavailability. The presence of similar volcanic springs at the time SRO are thought to have originated (>3.4 Ga) may have supplied (bi)sulfite that supported ancestral SRO. These observations coincide with the lack of inferred SO42− reduction capacity in nearly all organisms with early-branching DsrAB and which are near universally found in hydrothermal environments.en_US
dc.identifier.citationColman, Daniel R., Melody R. Lindsay, Maximiliano J. Amenabar, Maria C. Fernandes-Martins, Eric R. Roden, and Eric S. Boyd. “Phylogenomic Analysis of Novel Diaforarchaea Is Consistent with Sulfite but Not Sulfate Reduction in Volcanic Environments on Early Earth.” The ISME Journal 14, no. 5 (February 17, 2020): 1316–1331. doi:10.1038/s41396-020-0611-9.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1751-7362
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/16096
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rights© This final published version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license.en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.titlePhylogenomic analysis of novel Diaforarchaea is consistent with sulfite but not sulfate reduction in volcanic environments on early Earthen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage1316en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage1331en_US
mus.citation.issue5en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleThe ISME Journalen_US
mus.citation.volume14en_US
mus.data.thumbpage6en_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1038/s41396-020-0611-9en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Agricultureen_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Letters & Scienceen_US
mus.relation.departmentMicrobiology & Immunology.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
colman-phylogenomic-diaforarchaea-2020.pdf
Size:
1.18 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Phylogenomic analysis of novel Diaforarchaea is consistent with sulfite but not sulfate reduction in volcanic environments on early Earth (PDF)

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
826 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.