Browsing by Author "Vavrovsky, Joe"
Now showing 1 - 20 of 74
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item 2001 Cereal Forage Species, Variety and Seeding Rate Studies(Central Agricultural Research Center, 2001) Wichman, David M.; Vavrovsky, Joe; Sharp, Gail L.; Cash, S.D.; Johnson, D.; Hensleigh, Pat F.; Hybner, Roger M.; Carr, P.This report determines the forage production potential of spring and winter cereal grain species and varieties under dryland conditions in central Montana. Determine the optimum spring cereal seeding rates for maximum forage production. Cereal forage yields were respectable considering the low precipitation levels received over the past year. Fall 2000 and early spring seeded crops on tilled soils experienced severe and multiple soil blasting and seedling burial. Therefore, the data presented here is not sufficient to make extensive inferences or comparisons amongst varieties or species.Item 2001 Evaluation of Non-Alfalfa Perennial Legumes(Central Agricultural Research Center, 2001) Wichman, David M.; Vavrovsky, Joe; Cash, S.D.; Ditterline, R. L.This report determines yield levels of modern varieties non-bloat causing perennial forage legumes: sainfoin, birdsfoot trefoil, and cicer milkvetch relative to yields of alfalfa check varieties. Dry weather and other droughty conditions have been hard on the non-bloat causing perennial legumes. In 2001, alfalfa entries have proved to be superior in dry matter yield production than the entries of sainfoin, birdsfoot trefoil, and cicer milkvetch. There appears to be some difference between varieties, for forage yield, with in each of species (See Tables F 5 &F 6). Due to the unusually dry weather the past couple of years, hopefully it remains classified as “unusually dry” rather than the beginning of a new norm, it is best not to make any conjectures about relative yield levels of the various varieties.Item 2001 Montana Intra-State Alfalfa Variety Trials(Central Agricultural Research Center, 2001) Wichman, David M.; Vavrovsky, Joe; Cash, S.D.; Ditterline, R. L.; Sharp, Gail L.This report identifies superior alfalfa varieties for dryland forage production in central Montana. Yield results for alfalfa variety nurseries seeded in the years 2001, 2000, 1998, and 1997 are presented in tables 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Drought conditions persisting since the spring of 1997 continue to depress alfalfa forage yields. Warm winter weather which allow perennials, such as alfalfa, to remain actively growing through the late fall, winter and or early spring cause the plants to deplete soil water reserves while producing little vegetation. Yield levels are one third to one fourth of the expected yields. No significant variations in disease infections or insect feedings have been observed. Little variation in plot/treatment ranking across years has been observed. This indicates the importance of getting a good stand to start with. Ladak 65 yield levels continue to be similar to those of more modern varieties which have greater disease resistance. However, recent years have been dry and unsuitable for outstanding yield levels. In better yield conditions, this researcher expects modern varieties to exhibit a higher yield level relative to Ladak 65.Item 2001 Perennial Grass Species and Variety Forage Yield Evaluations(Central Agricultural Research Center, 2001) Wichman, David M.; Vavrovsky, Joe; Cash, S.D.; Ditterline, R. L.; Majerus, M.This report identifies superior alfalfa varieties for dryland forage production in central Montana. Yield results for alfalfa variety nurseries seeded in the years 2001, 2000, 1998, and 1997 are presented in tables 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Drought conditions persisting since the spring of 1997 continue to depress alfalfa forage yields. Warm winter weather which allow perennials, such as alfalfa, to remain actively growing through the late fall, winter and or early spring cause the plants to deplete soil water reserves while producing little vegetation. Yield levels are one third to one fourth of the expected yields. No significant variations in disease infections or insect feedings have been observed. Little variation in plot/treatment ranking across years has been observed. This indicates the importance of getting a good stand to start with. Ladak 65 yields levels continue to similar to those of more modern varieties which have greater disease resistance. However, recent years have been dry and unsuitable for outstanding yield levels. In better yield conditions, this researcher expects modern varieties to exhibit a higher yield level relative to Ladak 65.Item 2002 Evaluation of Non-Alfalfa Perennial Legumes(Central Agricultural Research Center, 2002) Wichman, David M.; Vavrovsky, Joe; Cash, S.D.; Ditterline, R. L.This report determines yield levels of modern varieties of non-bloat causing perennial forage legumes, such as sainfoin, birdsfoot trefoil, and cicer milkvetch, relative to yields of alfalfa check varieties. Dry weather and other droughty conditions have been hard on the non-bloat causing perennial legumes. In dry matter yield production for 2002, 2001 and 2000, the alfalfa entries have proven to be superior to the entries of sainfoin, birdsfoot trefoil, and cicer milkvetch. Within each species and between varieties, there appears to be some differences in forage yield (see Tables F6 & F7). Due to the unusually dry weather the past couple of years, (hopefully it remains classified as “unusually dry” rather than the beginning of a new norm), it is best not to make any conjectures about relative yield levels of the various varieties.Item 2002 Montana Intra-State Alfalfa Variety Trials(Central Agricultural Research Center, 2002) Wichman, David M.; Vavrovsky, Joe; Cash, S.D.; Ditterline, R. L.; Sharp, Gail L.This report identifies superior alfalfa varieties for dryland forage production in central Montana. Yield results for alfalfa variety nurseries seeded in the years 2002, 2001, 2000, 1998, and 1997 are presented in tables F 1 through F 5, respectively. Drought conditions persisting since the spring of 1997 continue to depress alfalfa forage yields. Warm winter weather, which allows perennials such as alfalfa to remain actively growing through the late fall, winter and or early spring, causes the plants to deplete soil water reserves while producing little vegetation. Yield levels have been one half to one third of the expected yields. No significant variations in disease infections or insect feedings have been observed. Little variation in plot/treatment ranking across years has been observed. This indicates the importance of getting a good stand initially. Ladak-65 yield levels continue to be similar to those of more modern varieties, which have greater disease resistance. However, recent years have been dry and unsuitable for outstanding yield levels. In better yield conditions, this researcher expects modern varieties to exhibit a higher yield level relative to Ladak-65. The alfalfa nurseries have a scheduled longevity of four years. This provides sufficient information on yield potential. However, the stand longevity factor is not determined. Statewide alfalfa variety trial information is available at: http://animalrangeextension.montana.edu/Forage/forage_pub.htmItem 2003 Evaluation of Barley Variety Performance in Recrop Systems Following Oilseeds Near Moccasin, Lentils Near Denton and Winter Wheat Near Fort Benton(Central Agricultural Research Center, 2003) Blake, Tom; Hensleigh, Pat F.; Philips, Dave; Vavrovsky, Joe; Wargo, Judee; Wichman, David M.This report evaluates the agronomic performance of spring barley varieties in recrop or continuous crop environments in the southern triangle and central Montana. Drought conditions contributed to low yields and test weights and above normal grain protein levels. Haxby and Conlin exhibited the ability produce well and to produce decent test weights in droughty conditions. Xena exhibited good yield potential in droughty conditions, also.Item 2003 Evaluation of Durum Wheat Variety Performance Under No-Till Recrop Conditions Following a Pulse Crop Near Moccasin, Montana and 2003 Evaluation of Durum Wheat Variety Performance in Recrop Systems near Denton and Fort Benton(Central Agricultural Research Center, 2003) Lanning, Susan P.; Philips, Dave; Talbert, Luther E.; Vavrovsky, Joe; Wargo, Judee; Wichman, David M.This report evaluates the agronomic performance of durum wheat varieties in recrop or continuous crop environments in the southern triangle and central Montana. Twenty spring durum varieties were re-cropped no-till into lentil stubble. The only supplemental fertilizer was 50lbs per acre of 20-20-20-10 blend applied through the drill at seeding. Conditions were good at seeding, but plant available moisture conditions deteriorated through June and July resulting in low yields and low test weights. Drought conditions contributed to low yields and test weights and above normal grain protein levels. New varieties are steadily replacing many of the old standards as the consistent top yielders.Item 2003 Evaluation of IMI-tolerant winter wheat variety performance in recrop trials at Fife near Belt and Great Falls(Central Agricultural Research Center, 2003) Berg, Jim E.; Bruckner, Phil L.; Vavrovsky, Joe; Wichman, David M.This report evaluates the agronomic performance of IMI-tolerant winter wheat varieties in recrop or continuous crop environments in the goat grass infested area near Belt. The IMI-tolerant winter wheat variety trial was re-cropped till-plant after spring wheat. The site was very dry at seeding as the double disk plot drill penetrated the soil surface to a depth of ¾ to 1 inch. Stand establishment was good. The dry conditions persisted through the spring at the test site. The IMI tolerant trait did provide the opportunity to control jointed goat grass without killing the wheat. The droughty conditions limited the evaluation of the yield potential of these lines. Some lines did show good yield potential relative to standard varieties in severe limited moisture environment.Item 2003 Evaluation of Spring Wheat Variety Performance in No-Till Recrop After Pulse Crop System Near Moccasin(Central Agricultural Research Center, 2003) Lanning, Susan P.; Talbert, Luther E.; Vavrovsky, Joe; Wichman, David M.This report evaluates the agronomic performance of spring wheat varieties in recrop or continuous crop environments in central Montana. Drought conditions contributed to low yields and test weights and above normal grain protein levels. These trials continue to show how spring wheat varieties perform in less than ideal plant available water conditions.Item 2003 Evaluation of Winter Wheat Variety Performance on No-Till Recrop into Undisturbed Barley Stubble Near Moccasin(Central Agricultural Research Center, 2003) Berg, Jim E.; Bruckner, Phil L.; Philips, Dave; Vavrovsky, Joe; Wargo, Judee; Wichman, David M.Evaluate agronomic performance of winter wheat varieties in recrop or continuous crop environments in the southern triangle and central Montana. 2003 Winter wheat variety trial re-cropped no-till after barley was established at the Central Agricultural Research Center on land in its eighth year of continuous no-till annual cropping. Center on land in its eighth year of continuous no-till annual cropping (since 1996). The current rotation is: pulse – spring wheat – canola/mustard – barley – barley – winter wheat – pulse crop. Soil moisture conditions were fair to good at seeding. conditions were fair to good at seeding (soil moisture probe depth 10-12”). However, high post seeding temperatures and winds dried the soil late into the fall. Much above average April precipitation contributed to excellent yield potential. Return of severe drought conditions in early June resulted low test weights which deflated the yield levels. The droughty weather in combination with the variable shallow soils resulted in extremely variable yield results and low confidence results. No-Till recrop weather precipitation conditions were such that early maturity was favored. The later the maturity the greater the exposure to increased heat and reduced plant available moisture. The main factor missing was winter stress. The good performance of several numbered lines indicate the potential for improved varieties in the near future.Item 2003 Field Performance Evaluation of Fungicides on Spring Wheat(Central Agricultural Research Center, 2003) Carlson, G. R.; Riesselman, John (Jack); Vavrovsky, Joe; Wichman, David M.This report evaluates the relative effect of seed treatments on spring wheat production. Drought conditions contributed to low yields and test weights and above normal grain protein levels. These trials continue to show how spring wheat varieties perform in less than ideal plant available water conditions.Item 2003 Spring Barley Intrastate and Preliminary Performance Nurseries in Crop-Fallow Systems in Central Montana(Central Agricultural Research Center, 2003) Blake, Tom; Hensleigh, Pat F.; Vavrovsky, Joe; Wichman, David M.This report evaluates the agronomic performance of advanced (2107) and early generation (3107) spring barley development lines in crop-fallow environments in central Montana. Drought conditions contributed to low yields and test weights and above normal grain protein levels. Haxby and Conlin exhibited the ability produce well and to produce decent test weights in droughty conditions. Xena exhibited good yield potential in droughty conditions, also.Item 2003 Spring Oat Variety Grain Yield Evaluations(Central Agricultural Research Center, 2003) Blake, Tom; Hensleigh, Pat F.; Vavrovsky, Joe; Wichman, David M.Evaluate the agronomic performance of oat varieties and development lines in crop-fallow environment in central Montana. Cool wet growing conditions in April delayed emergence and development of spring seeded cereals. Dry conditions along with much above average temperatures in June and July contributed to low yield potentials and low test weights. For some cereals tillering was reduced so test weights were not as low as in other instances. Drought conditions contributed to low yields and test weights and above normal grain protein levels.Item 2003 Statewide Evaluation of Spring Wheat Variety Performance in Advanced Yield and Preliminary Yield Trials(Central Agricultural Research Center, 2003) Lanning, Susan P.; Talbert, Luther E.; Vavrovsky, Joe; Wichman, David M.This report evaluates the agronomic performance of advanced and early generation spring wheat lines under a crop-fallow environment in central Montana. Drought conditions contributed to low yields and test weights and above normal grain protein levels. These trials continue to show how spring wheat varieties perform in less than ideal plant available water conditions.Item 2004 Evaluation of Soft Winter Wheat Variety Performance Under Fallow at the Central Agricultural Research Center, Near Moccasin(Central Ag Research Center, 2004) Berg, Jim E.; Bruckner, Phil L.; Vavrovsky, Joe; Wichman, David M.This report evaluates the agronomic performance, particularly winter hardiness, of soft winter wheat varieties in crop-fallow environments in the central Montana. The soft white winter wheat was seeded into tilled fallow soil on 23-September 2003. Emergence was uniform. uniform. The 2003-04 winter was relatively mild as some spring wheat over wintered in stubble. However, two soft white winter wheat varieties, Lewjain and Stephens, had severe winterkill. two soft white winter wheat varieties, Lewjain and Stephens, had severe winterkill. Three soft white entries topped the yield, not significantly, of the hard red check variety Neeley. The soft white varieties evaluated do not have sufficient winter hardiness to be raised in areas which frequently have bare soils and windy conditions during the winter months.Item 2004 Evaluation of Winter Wheat Variety Performance on No-Till Recrop at Moccasin and Denton(Central Agricultural Research Center, 2004) Berg, Jim E.; Bruckner, Phil L.; Vavrovsky, Joe; Wichman, David M.; Wargo, Judee; Philips, DaveEvaluate agronomic performance of winter wheat varieties in no-till re-crop (continuous) crop environments near Moccasin and Denton, Montana. The growing conditions for the 2004 winter wheat crop were much better than most recent years. Moisture conditions were not outstanding, but cool June temperatures minimized evaporation demand during critical seed fill. However, below average precipitation in June and July resulted in below average test weights. holding capacities. The use of broadleaf legume and oilseed crops has facilitated the use of a wider array of herbicides which has help managed wild oats, downy brome and other weeds often associated with cereal only systems. MT00159 continues to have outstanding yield performance as it has done in the two previous years. Winter wheat yields were much above expectations for both the Moccasin and Denton locations given the below average precipitation levels. The protein levels indicate some nitrogen loss may have occurred at the Denton location.Item Advanced Yield and Preliminary Spring Wheat Variety Performance Trials (2001)(Central Agricultural Research Center, 2001) Lanning, Susan P.; Sharp, Gail L.; Talbert, Luther E.; Vavrovsky, Joe; Wichman, David M.This report evaluates agronomic performance of new experimental lines and existing hard red spring wheat varieties in Central Montana. The Advanced Yields ranged from 34.3 to 47.5 bu/a and averaged 40.5 bu/a. Due to low precipitation, grain yields were lower than average. Test weights averaged below normal at 58 lbs/bu and proteins averaged 17.3 percent. Preliminary Yields ranged from 29.8 to 44.6 bu/a with the average yield being 35.7 bu/a. Test weights averaged 57.4 lbs/bu and grain protein averaged 18.3 percent. Broken stems were noticed in the nurseries this year and were attributed to strawbreaker, a disease of wheat caused by the fungus Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides. Stem breakage in the Advanced Yield grain nursery was not significant and averaged less than 0.1 percent of the total plot. Stem breakage in the Preliminary Yield grain nursery ranged from 0 to 2 percent except for one experimental line where breakage was recorded at 14 percent of the total plot. High protein levels accompanied lower than average test weights in both nurseries indicative of the low level of moisture received this year.Item Advanced Yield and Preliminary Spring Wheat Variety Performance Trials (2002)(Central Agricultural Research Center, 2002) Lanning, Susan P.; Sharp, Gail L.; Talbert, Luther E.; Vavrovsky, JoeThis report evaluates agronomic performance of new experimental lines and existing hard red spring wheat varieties in Central Montana. The advanced and preliminary yield spring wheat nurseries were hailed on July 8, August 20, and August 22, 2002 resulting in a complete loss. Plant heights and heading dates were recorded before the trials were damaged. Heading information is presented as day of the year from January 1st.Item Canola and Sweet Lupin -- Potential New Rotation Crops for Central Montana (2003)(Central Agricultural Research Center, 2003) Chen, Chengci; Wichman, David M.; Neill, Karnes E.; Brown, Jack; Weeden, Norman F.; Vavrovsky, JoeThis paper evaluates new regular and specialty canola genotypes from public and private breeders from various regions of U.S. and Canada for adaptation and evaluates narrow leaf lupine genotypes, from Australia and Poland, for adaptation and yield potential in central Montana. Due to the severe summer drought in 2003, canola and lupin did not perform well in the field. Yields were extremely low. Although differences were observed among the cultivars, there was not enough evidence to justify the adaptability of the genotypes in this one-year trial under an unusual weather pattern. The growth chamber study shows great variations among canola genotypes in base temperature and heat unit required for emergence. These results will provide a reference for the selection of canola genotypes for early planting. Previous studies have shown yield advantage of early seeding.