Scholarly Work - History, Philosophy, and Religious Studies
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/3466
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Reparative agency and commitment in William James’ pragmatism(Informa UK Limited, 2022-02) Sheehey, BonnieThis paper highlights a central feature of William James’ pragmatism to challenge the conflicting charges that his political and ethical thought amounts to either a Hamlet-like impotence or a Promethean-like sovereignty. I argue that James develops an account of reparative agency and commitment which figures in his philosophy of hope as a response to the problematics of action. Reparative agency concerns the possibility of acting in the midst of constraints that frustrate or otherwise inhibit action. Conceptualizing agency in this way entails a reevaluation of the status of commitment in James’ thought and the possibility of a more collective practice of hope.Item Metaphorical and Literal Groundings: Unsettling Groundless Normativity in Environmental Ethics(Philosophy Documentation Center, 2020-01) Cook, Anna; Sheehey, BonnieAccounts of grounded normativity in Indigenous philosophy can be used to challenge the groundlessness of Western environmental ethical approaches such as Aldo Leopold’s land ethic. Attempts to ground normativity in mainstream Western ethical theory deploy a metaphorical grounding that covers up the literal grounded normativity of Indigenous philosophical practices. Furthermore, Leopold’s land ethic functions as a form of settler philosophical guardianship that works to erase, assimilate, and effectively silence localized Indigenous knowledges through a delocalized ethical standard. Finally, grounded normativity challenges settlers to question their desire for groundless normative theory and practice as reflective of their evasion of ethical responsibility for the destruction and genocide of Indigenous communities.