<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Thermodynamic and modeling insights of DNA molecular beacons with dual target binding to design for tunable fluorescent outputs

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Royal Society of Chemistry

DOI

10.1039/D5AN01208B

Abstract

Molecular beacons (MBs) offer a versatile platform for detecting specific nucleic acid targets based on the relative proximity of fluorophore and quencher molecules. Conventional MBs contain a single target-binding site in the loop, and hybridization has been modeled based on three specific phases: closed hairpin, random coil, and target-bound. The MB-target interactions can be tuned by stem length and target site location, while multi-site MBs introduce allosteric effects that modulate affinity and produce steeper, switch-like responses. Despite available thermodynamic models, current in silico methods do not adequately predict complex sensor outputs, especially for multi-site interactions. We present a new mathematical framework for calculating the thermodynamic parameters of MBs with two target binding sites. Our model additionally accounts for non-saturating target concentrations and target dimerization, extending its application to more complex reactions. We used three novel MB designs to validate the model, comparing single- and dual-target interactions and assessing temperature-dependent effects. Our approach captures both occupancy and temperature-dependent complex behavior of multi-site and single-site MBs, revealing how a second binding event can enhance affinity and tune the dynamic range. Full derivations and design recommendations are provided, offering a predictive tool to guide the rational design of multi-site MBs with controlled thermodynamics and fluorescent responses.

Description

Citation

Esther E. Stopps, Stephanie E. McCalla; Thermodynamic and modeling insights of DNA molecular beacons with dual target binding to design for tunable fluorescent outputs. Analyst 2026; 151 (5): 1420–1435. https://doi.org/10.1039/d5an01208b

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By