Consumer Recall of Brand Versus Product Banner Ads

dc.contributor.authorVan Steenburg, Eric
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-28T17:52:50Z
dc.date.available2018-02-28T17:52:50Z
dc.date.issued2012-09
dc.description.abstractPurpose – The paper aims to determine the effectiveness of specific online advertisements, comparing banner ads that are brand‐reinforcing versus ones that are product‐reinforcing. Design/methodology/approach – The research uses three experimental design studies to empirically test the hypotheses based on the elaboration likelihood model (ELM) by manipulating type of online banner advertisement (brand‐type versus product‐type) and measuring individual need for cognition (NFC). Findings – Consumers high in NFC recall product‐type banner ads more readily than those low in NFC, while brand‐type banner ads are more likely to be recalled by low‐NFC consumers. However, high‐NFC consumers recall brand‐type ads under all situational influences tested. And while consumers low in NFC recall product‐type banner ads featuring a directive better than their high‐NFC counterparts, they do not recall directive ads at a greater rate than high‐NFC consumers recall brand‐type ads. Research limitations/implications – While previous research has found that variations in ad size, color, interactivity, and web site location affect recall, this research only measured static banner ads that appear at the top of the page. However, because it is the first to examine involvement in terms of NFC in combination with brand‐ and product‐type ads, the research sheds new light on consumer awareness of two types of banner ad strategies adopted by marketing managers today. Practical implications – In an online context, the type of banner ads used by marketing managers should be paired with the web site based on how much time consumers spend at the site and how many pages they click through at the site. All things being equal, however, managers should favor brand‐type banner ads over product‐type banner ads. Originality/value – The research extends understanding of ELM as it relates to type of banner ad while establishing a potential research stream for better understanding of how consumers process various types of online ads. At the same time, it provides new evidence that can help marketing managers make better strategic decisions regarding their online marketing mix.en_US
dc.identifier.citationVan Steenburg, Eric. “Consumer Recall of Brand Versus Product Banner Ads.” Edited by Francisco Guzmán. Journal of Product & Brand Management 21, no. 6 (September 14, 2012): 452–464. doi:10.1108/10610421211264937.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1061-0421
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/14418
dc.titleConsumer Recall of Brand Versus Product Banner Adsen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage452en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage464en_US
mus.citation.issue6en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleJournal of Product & Brand Managementen_US
mus.citation.volume21en_US
mus.data.thumbpage5en_US
mus.identifier.categoryBusiness, Economics & Managementen_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1108/10610421211264937en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Businessen_US
mus.relation.departmentBusiness.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
VanSteenburg_JoPBM_2012_A1b.pdf
Size:
458.23 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Consumer Recall of Brand Versus Product Banner Ads (PDF)

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
826 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.