Role of vegetation in determining carbon sequestration along ecological succession in the southeastern United States

dc.contributor.authorStoy, Paul C.
dc.contributor.authorKatul, Gabriel G.
dc.contributor.authorSiqueira, Mario B. S.
dc.contributor.authorJuang, Jehn-Yih
dc.contributor.authorNovick, Kimberly A.
dc.contributor.authorMcCarthy, Heather R.
dc.contributor.authorOishi, A. Christopher
dc.contributor.authorOren, Ram
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-25T15:54:13Z
dc.date.available2019-02-25T15:54:13Z
dc.date.issued2008-06
dc.description.abstractVegetation plays a central role in controlling terrestrial carbon (C) exchange, but quantifying its impacts on C cycling on time scales of ecological succession is hindered by a lack of long‐term observations. The net ecosystem exchange of carbon (NEE) was measured for several years in adjacent ecosystems that represent distinct phases of ecological succession in the southeastern USA. The experiment was designed to isolate the role of vegetation – apart from climate and soils – in controlling biosphere–atmosphere fluxes of CO2 and water vapor. NEE was near zero over 5 years at an early successional old‐field ecosystem (OF). However, mean annual NEE was nearly equal, approximately −450 g C m−2 yr−1, at an early successional planted pine forest (PP) and a late successional hardwood forest (HW) due to the sensitivity of the former to drought and ice storm damage. We hypothesize that these observations can be explained by the relationships between gross ecosystem productivity (GEP), ecosystem respiration (RE) and canopy conductance, and long‐term shifts in ecosystem physiology in response to climate to maintain near‐constant ecosystem‐level water‐use efficiency (EWUE). Data support our hypotheses, but future research should examine if GEP and RE are causally related or merely controlled by similar drivers. At successional time scales, GEP and RE observations generally followed predictions from E. P. Odum's ‘Strategy of Ecosystem Development’, with the surprising exception that the relationship between GEP and RE resulted in large NEE at the late successional HW. A practical consequence of this research suggests that plantation forestry may confer no net benefit over the conservation of mature forests for C sequestration.en_US
dc.identifier.citationStoy, Paul C., Gabriel G. Katul, Mario B. S. Siqueira, Jehn-Yih Juang, Kimberly A. Novick, Heather R. McCarthy, A. Christopher Oishi, and Ram Oren. “Role of Vegetation in Determining Carbon Sequestration Along Ecological Succession in the Southeastern United States.” Global Change Biology 14, no. 6 (June 2008): 1409–1427. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01587.x.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2486
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/15276
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.titleRole of vegetation in determining carbon sequestration along ecological succession in the southeastern United Statesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage1409en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage1427en_US
mus.citation.issue6en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleGlobal Change Biologyen_US
mus.citation.volume14en_US
mus.data.thumbpage9en_US
mus.identifier.categoryLife Sciences & Earth Sciencesen_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01587.xen_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Agricultureen_US
mus.relation.departmentLand Resources & Environmental Sciences.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
StoyLab_GCB_2008_FINAL.pdf
Size:
475.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
826 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections

Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.