Spatial heterogeneity across five rangelands managed with pyric‐herbivory

dc.contributor.authorMcGranahan, Devan A.
dc.contributor.authorEngle, David M.
dc.contributor.authorFuhlendorf, Samuel D.
dc.contributor.authorWinter, Steven J.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, James R.
dc.contributor.authorDebinski, Diane M.
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-04T17:04:18Z
dc.date.available2018-12-04T17:04:18Z
dc.date.issued2012-07
dc.description.abstract1. Many rangelands evolved under an interactive disturbance regime in which grazers respond to the spatial pattern of fire and create a patchy, heterogeneous landscape. Spatially heterogeneous fire and grazing create heterogeneity in vegetation structure at the landscape level (patch contrast) and increase rangeland biodiversity. We analysed five experiments comparing spatially heterogeneous fire treatments to spatially homogeneous fire treatments on grazed rangeland along a precipitation gradient in the North American Great Plains. 2. We predicted that, across the precipitation gradient, management for heterogeneity increases both patch contrast and variance in the composition of plant functional groups. Furthermore, we predicted that patch contrast is positively correlated with variance in plant functional group composition. Because fire spread is important to the fire–grazing interaction, we discuss factors that reduce fire spread and reduce patch contrast despite management for heterogeneity. 3. We compared patch contrast across pastures managed for heterogeneity and pastures managed for homogeneity with a linear mixed effect (LME) regression model. We used the LME model to partition variation in vegetation structure to each sampled scale so that a higher proportion of variation at the patch scale among pastures managed for heterogeneity indicates patch contrast. To examine the relationship between vegetation structure and plant community composition, we used constrained ordination to measure variation in functional group composition along the vegetation structure gradient. We used the meta‐analytical statistic, Cohen’s d, to compare effect sizes for patch contrast and plant functional group composition. 4. Management for heterogeneity increased patch contrast and increased the range of plant functional group composition at three of the five experimental locations. 5. Plant functional group composition varied in proportion to the amount of spatial heterogeneity in vegetation structure on pastures managed for heterogeneity. 6. Synthesis and applications. Pyric‐herbivory management for heterogeneity created patch contrast in vegetation across a broad range of precipitation and plant community types, provided that fire was the primary driver of grazer site selection. Management for heterogeneity did not universally create patch contrast. Stocking rate and invasive plant species are key regulators of heterogeneity, as they determine the influence of fire on the spatial pattern of fuel, vegetation structure and herbivore patch selection, and therefore also require careful management.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipIowa State Wildlife Grants program with the United States. Fish and Wildlife Service Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Program (#T-1-R-15); Joint Fire Science Program grant number (#201814G905); National Research Initiative grant number (#2006-35320-17476)en_US
dc.identifier.citationDevan A. McGranahan, David M. Engle, Samuel D. Fuhlendorf, Steven J. Winter, James R. Miller, & Diane M. Debinski. "Spatial Heterogeneity Across Five Rangelands Managed with Pyric-Herbivory" Journal of Applied Ecology Vol. 49 Iss. 4 (2012) p. 903 - 910, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02168.xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2664
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/15048
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.titleSpatial heterogeneity across five rangelands managed with pyric‐herbivoryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage903en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage910en_US
mus.citation.issue4en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleJournal of Applied Ecologyen_US
mus.citation.volume49en_US
mus.contributor.orcidDebinski, Diane M.|0000-0002-7144-4640en_US
mus.data.thumbpage1en_US
mus.identifier.categoryLife Sciences & Earth Sciencesen_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02168.xen_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Letters & Scienceen_US
mus.relation.departmentEcology.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Debinski_JAE_2012_A1b.pdf
Size:
254.19 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Spatial heterogeneity across five rangelands managed with pyric‐herbivory (PDF)

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
826 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.