Which tree species and biome types are most vulnerable to climate change in the US Northern Rocky Mountains?

dc.contributor.authorHansen, Andrew J.
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Linda B.
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-17T20:27:18Z
dc.date.available2015-03-17T20:27:18Z
dc.date.issued2015-02
dc.description.abstractThe goal of this study was to assess components of vulnerability of tree species and biome types to projected future climate within the Great Northern Landscape Conservation Cooperative (GNLCC) in the US Northern Rockies and the ecosystems surrounding Glacier and Yellowstone/Grand Teton National Parks. We drew on the results of five published studies and analyzed current and projected future climate suitability for 11 tree species and 8 biome types under two IPCC emissions scenarios. We assessed components of vulnerability based on four metrics of current and projected future climate suitability. Results for biome types indicated largely a shift from climates suitable for alpine and subalpine conifer to climates suitable for desert scrub and grassland types. Results from the four studies of tree species indicated substantial loss of area of climate suitability for the four subalpine species by 2100. This was especially true for Whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis). Suitable climate for this species dropped from just over 20% of the study area in the reference period to 0.5–7.0% by 2070–2100 under the A2 scenario. The studies agreed in projecting expansion of climate suitability for some montane tree species but disagreed on expansion of climate suitability of west-side mesic tree species to eastside locations such as Yellowstone National park. Importantly, the rankings of tree species vulnerability were similar among studies, scenarios, and geographic areas and indicated highest vulnerability for Whitebark pine and Mountain hemlock (Tsuga mertensiana). The results should help federal managers in the GNLCC prioritize tree species for climate adaptation strategies. Moreover, our methods for using published data as a basis for climate vulnerability assessment can be applied within other LCCs across the US and other management units internationally.en_US
dc.identifier.citationHansen, Andrew J., and Linda B. Phillips. Which tree species and biome types are most vulnerable to climate change in the US Northern Rocky Mountains?. Forest Ecology and Management. February 2015. Pages 68-83. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.11.008en_US
dc.identifier.issn0378-1127
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/8935
dc.subjectEcologyen_US
dc.subjectForestryen_US
dc.subjectPlant biologyen_US
dc.titleWhich tree species and biome types are most vulnerable to climate change in the US Northern Rocky Mountains?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage68en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage83en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleForest Ecology and Managementen_US
mus.citation.volume338en_US
mus.identifier.categoryLife Sciences & Earth Sciencesen_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1016/j.foreco.2014.11.008en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Letters & Scienceen_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Letters & Science
mus.relation.departmentEcology.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
HansenandPhillips_FEM_ 2015_POSTPRINT.pdf
Size:
6.48 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Which tree species and biome types are most vulnerable to climate change in the US Northern Rocky Mountains? (PDF)

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
826 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.