Are ecosystem carbon inputs and outputs coupled at short time scales? A case study from adjacent pine and hardwood forests using impulse-response analysis

dc.contributor.authorStoy, Paul C.
dc.contributor.authorPalmroth, Sari
dc.contributor.authorOishi, A. Christopher
dc.contributor.authorSiqueira, Mario B. S.
dc.contributor.authorJuang, Jehn-Yih
dc.contributor.authorNovick, Kimberly A.
dc.contributor.authorWard, Eric J.
dc.contributor.authorKatul, Gabriel G.
dc.contributor.authorOren, Ram
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-20T16:19:01Z
dc.date.available2019-02-20T16:19:01Z
dc.date.issued2007-06
dc.description.abstractA number of recent studies have attributed a large proportion of soil respiration (Rsoil) to recently photoassimilated carbon (C). Time lags (τPR) associated with these pulses of photosynthesis and responses of Rsoil have been found on time scales of hours to weeks for different ecosystems, but most studies find evidence for τPR on the order of 1–5 d. We showed that such time scales are commensurate with CO2 diffusion time scales from the roots to the soil surface, and may thus be independent from photosynthetic pulses. To further quantify the role of physical (i.e. edaphic) and biological (i.e. vegetative) controls on such lags, we investigated τPR at adjacent planted pine (PP) and hardwood (HW) forest ecosystems over six and four measurement years, respectively, using both autocorrelation analysis on automated soil surface flux measurements and their lagged cross‐correlations with drivers for and surrogates of photosynthesis. Evidence for τPR on the order of 1–3 d was identified in both ecosystems and using both analyses, but this lag could not be attributed to recently photoassimilated C because the same analysis yielded comparable lags at HW during leaf‐off periods. Future efforts to model ecosystem C inputs and outputs in a pulse–response framework must combine measurements of transport in the physical and biological components of terrestrial ecosystems.en_US
dc.identifier.citationStoy, Paul C., Sari Palmroth, A. Christopher Oishi, Mario B. S. Siqueira, Jehn-Yih Juang, Kimberly A. Novick, Eric J. Ward, Gabriel G. Katul, and Ram Oren. “Are Ecosystem Carbon Inputs and Outputs Coupled at Short Time Scales? A Case Study from Adjacent Pine and Hardwood Forests Using Impulse?response Analysis.” Plant, Cell & Environment 30, no. 6 (June 2007): 700–710. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01655.x.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-3040
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/15272
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.titleAre ecosystem carbon inputs and outputs coupled at short time scales? A case study from adjacent pine and hardwood forests using impulse-response analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage700en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage710en_US
mus.citation.issue6en_US
mus.citation.journaltitlePlant, Cell and Environmenten_US
mus.citation.volume30en_US
mus.data.thumbpage7en_US
mus.identifier.categoryLife Sciences & Earth Sciencesen_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01655.xen_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Agricultureen_US
mus.relation.departmentLand Resources & Environmental Sciences.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
StoyLab_PCE_2007_FINAL.pdf
Size:
1.18 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
826 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections

Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.