Evaluating the effects of finishing diet and feeding location on sheep performance, carcass characteristics, and internal parasites
dc.contributor.author | Ragen, Devon L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Butler, Molly R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Boles, Jane A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Layton, William A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Craig, Thomas M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hatfield, Patrick G. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-08T15:22:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-08T15:22:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-05 | |
dc.description | © Copyright 2021 Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | A 3 yr experiment was conducted to evaluate the influence of diet and feeding location on animal performance, carcass characteristics, whole blood counts, and internal parasite burden of lambs assigned to 1 of 4 treatments: 1) confinement fed 71% alfalfa, 18% barley pellet, 5% molasses, 0.013% Bovatec, 6.1% vitamin/mineral package diet (CALF), 2) confinement fed 60% barley, 26% alfalfa pellet, 4% molasses, 2.5% soybean-hi pro, 0.016% Bovatec, 7.4% vitamin/mineral package diet (CBAR), 3) field fed 71% alfalfa, 18% barley pellet, 5% molasses, 0.013% Bovatec, 6.1% vitamin/mineral package diet (FALF), and 4) field fed 60% barley, 26% alfalfa pellet, 4% molasses, 2.5% soybean-hi pro, 0.016% Bovatec, 7.4% vitamin/mineral package diet (FBAR). A year × location interaction was detected for ending body weight (BW), average daily gain (ADG), and dry matter intake (DMI); therefore results are presented by year. In all years, cost of gain and DMI were greater for CALF and FALF than for CBAR and FBAR feed treatments (p ≤ 0.03). In yr 2 and 3 field treatments had greater ending BW and ADG than confinement treatments. For all years, diet did not affect ending BW or ADG. In yr 1 dressing percent and rib eye area were greater for field finished lambs than confinement finished (p ≤ 0.02) and Warner-Bratzler shear force was greater for CALF and FALF (p = 0.03). In yr 2 lambs in FALF and FBAR treatments had greater leg scores and conformation than CALF and CBAR (p = 0.09). In yr 1, FALF had a greater small intestine total worm count than all other treatments. In yr 1, ending Trichostrongyle type egg counts were greater for FALF (p = 0.05). In yr 2, ending Nematodirus spp. egg counts were greater for FALF and lowest for CBAR (p < 0.01). Abomasum Teladorsagia circumcinta worm burden was greater in CALF than all other treatments (p = 0.07) in yr 2. While field finishing lambs with a grain- or forage-based diet we conclude that it is possible to produce a quality lamb product without adverse effects to animal performance, carcass quality or increasing parasite burdens. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Ragen, D. L., Butler, M. R., Boles, J. A., Layton, W. A., Craig, T. M., & Hatfield, P. G. (2021). Evaluating the effects of finishing diet and feeding location on sheep performance, carcass characteristics, and internal parasites. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 63(3), 545. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2672-0191 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/17088 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology | en_US |
dc.rights | cc-by-nc | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_US |
dc.subject | diet sheep performance | en_US |
dc.title | Evaluating the effects of finishing diet and feeding location on sheep performance, carcass characteristics, and internal parasites | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
mus.citation.extentfirstpage | 545 | en_US |
mus.citation.extentlastpage | 562 | en_US |
mus.citation.issue | 3 | en_US |
mus.citation.journaltitle | Journal of Animal Science and Technology | en_US |
mus.citation.volume | 63 | en_US |
mus.identifier.doi | 10.5187/jast.2021.e42 | en_US |
mus.relation.college | College of Agriculture | en_US |
mus.relation.department | Animal & Range Sciences. | en_US |
mus.relation.university | Montana State University - Bozeman | en_US |