Emergy and energy analysis as an integrative indicator of sustainability: A case study in semi-arid Canadian farmlands

dc.contributor.authorFan, Jianling
dc.contributor.authorMcConkey, Brian G.
dc.contributor.authorJanzen, H. Henry
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Perry R.
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-11T16:03:42Z
dc.date.available2018-07-11T16:03:42Z
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.description.abstractAgricultural is essential to feed the human world but it can also degrade the physical world. Therefore, we need widely-accepted metrics to assess how prospective practices influence sustainability. We hypothesized that emergy and energy analyses considered together provide a robust, comprehensive measure of sustainability, and evaluated this hypothesis using findings from two field studies in the semiarid prairie region of Canada: a systems experiment including nine different 3-yr cropping rotation systems and a stubble experiment involving five preceding crop stubbles treatments with three nitrogen (N) addition levels. The grain yield emergy transformities of rotation systems with pulses, ranging from 0.68 to 0.83 E+05 sej J−1, were 32% lower (P < 0.05) than rotations without pulses. Significantly lower grain transformity of durum wheat grown on pulse stubbles than grown on durum wheat stubble were observed for both the systems and stubble experiments, suggested a higher crop production efficiency conferred by previous pulse crops. The emergy sustainability index (ESI) of Fallow-Durum wheat-Pea (F-D-P) rotation (1.94) was 1.3–2.2 times that of other rotations, while the continuous rotations increased ESI from 1.00–1.11 to ESIΔQ of 2.00–2.21 by considering the storage increase (ΔQ) of the system, i.e. soil organic carbon (SOC). The grain yield/energy input ratio (G/I) and energy output/energy input ratio (O/I) for F-D-P rotation (775 g MJ−1 and 12.9, respectively) were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those of all other rotations for its low energy input, which was obtained at the cost of huge SOC decrease. Modified energy use efficiency indices, G/IΔSOC and O/IΔSOC, were proposed in the present study to include the effect of SOC change (ΔSOC) in energy use efficiency by regarding ΔSOC as energy input where the system depleted SOC and as energy output where SOC accumulated. The G/IΔSOC and O/IΔSOC ratios for continuous rotations were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those of other rotations, indicating higher energy use efficiency in continuous rotation systems. Therefore, ESIΔQ and O/IΔSOC are recommended as sustainability indicators in emergy and energy analysis respectively, and we recommend that emergy and energy analysis should be done and considered together to have a more informative assessment of relative sustainability and efficiency of cropping systems.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Alberta Pulse Growers; Western Grains Research Foundation; AAFCen_US
dc.identifier.citationFan, Jianling, Brian G. McConkey, H. Henry Janzen, and Perry R. Miller. "Emergy and energy analysis as an integrative indicator of sustainability: A case study in semi-arid Canadian farmlands." Journal of Cleaner Production 172, no. 20 (January 2018): 428-437. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.200.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/14638
dc.rightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.titleEmergy and energy analysis as an integrative indicator of sustainability: A case study in semi-arid Canadian farmlandsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage428en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage437en_US
mus.citation.issue20en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleJournal of Cleaner Productionen_US
mus.citation.volume172en_US
mus.contributor.orcidMiller, Perry R.|0000-0003-4719-2137en_US
mus.data.thumbpage7en_US
mus.identifier.categoryLife Sciences & Earth Sciencesen_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.200en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Agricultureen_US
mus.relation.departmentLand Resources & Environmental Sciences.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Miller_JCP_2017_A1b.pdf
Size:
1.87 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
826 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.